When dispatching for an ambulance service requiring another ambulance for an intercept, what is the correct procedure?

When dispatching for an ambulance service requiring another ambulance for an intercept, what is the correct procedure?

• A. Open a new call for both ambulances
• B. Add the second rig to the existing call
• C. Change the call priority
• D. Request confirmation on intercept location

Answer: (B)

The correct procedure when dispatching for an ambulance service that requires another ambulance for an intercept is to add the second rig to the existing call. This approach maintains continuity in incident management and ensures that all units involved in the call are well-coordinated. By adding the second ambulance to the current call, all pertinent information about the incident, such as location, patient condition, and other responding units, remains consolidated. This practice enhances communication and efficiency, allowing for quicker and more effective response times. Opening a new call for both ambulances would create unnecessary duplication and could lead to confusion regarding the specifics of the incident and resource allocation. Changing the call priority could disrupt the established response levels and may not be necessary if the current resources can effectively manage the situation. Requesting confirmation on the intercept location is indeed crucial, but it is not the primary procedural step for dispatching the additional ambulance. Instead, it is part of ensuring operational clarity once the decision to intercept has been made. Thus, adding the second rig to the existing call is the most effective and standard practice in this scenario.

The correct procedure when dispatching for an ambulance service that requires another ambulance for an intercept is to add the second rig to the existing call. This approach maintains continuity in incident management and ensures that all units involved in the call are well-coordinated. By adding the second ambulance to the current call, all pertinent information about the incident, such as location, patient condition, and other responding units, remains consolidated. This practice enhances communication and efficiency, allowing for quicker and more effective response times.

Opening a new call for both ambulances would create unnecessary duplication and could lead to confusion regarding the specifics of the incident and resource allocation. Changing the call priority could disrupt the established response levels and may not be necessary if the current resources can effectively manage the situation. Requesting confirmation on the intercept location is indeed crucial, but it is not the primary procedural step for dispatching the additional ambulance. Instead, it is part of ensuring operational clarity once the decision to intercept has been made. Thus, adding the second rig to the existing call is the most effective and standard practice in this scenario.