When an officer requests a 29 check and finds negative results in CWIS and NCIC, but a local municipal warrant exists, how should the officer respond?

When an officer requests a 29 check and finds negative results in CWIS and NCIC, but a local municipal warrant exists, how should the officer respond?

• A. Report them as a suspect
• B. Indicate they're valid and have a municipal cite and release
• C. Advise that they are a possible fugitive
• D. Dismiss the check as unimportant

Answer: (B)

The correct response is to indicate that the individual is valid and has a municipal citation that requires a release. This is appropriate because even though there were no findings in nationwide databases like CWIS and NCIC, the existence of a local municipal warrant remains a legal basis for action. Municipal citations may relate to specific violations under local ordinances and must be respected, as they can lead to necessary legal proceedings. Acknowledging the municipal warrant shows that the officer is operating within their jurisdiction and is aware of local law enforcement protocols. It underlines the importance of checking local databases, as they may contain information that is not captured by larger national databases. Additionally, ignoring the local warrant by dismissing the check as unimportant would not only be unprofessional, but it could also undermine law enforcement efforts to maintain public safety by omitting pertinent information about an individual's legal status.

The correct response is to indicate that the individual is valid and has a municipal citation that requires a release. This is appropriate because even though there were no findings in nationwide databases like CWIS and NCIC, the existence of a local municipal warrant remains a legal basis for action. Municipal citations may relate to specific violations under local ordinances and must be respected, as they can lead to necessary legal proceedings.

Acknowledging the municipal warrant shows that the officer is operating within their jurisdiction and is aware of local law enforcement protocols. It underlines the importance of checking local databases, as they may contain information that is not captured by larger national databases. Additionally, ignoring the local warrant by dismissing the check as unimportant would not only be unprofessional, but it could also undermine law enforcement efforts to maintain public safety by omitting pertinent information about an individual's legal status.