If an individual has a MN license that is suspended ID only, how should this information be communicated back?

If an individual has a MN license that is suspended ID only, how should this information be communicated back?

• A. Valid and suspended status
• B. 104 secure 27 *acknowledge* MN status is suspended ID only, ND not on file, 29 negative
• C. Invalid license, no action needed
• D. License under review

Answer: (B)

The most accurate way to communicate that an individual has a Minnesota license which is suspended for identification purposes only is through a detailed and specific response. The option indicating a secure acknowledgment provides essential information for law enforcement or other parties involved. It clearly states that the MN status is suspended for ID only, ensuring that the responding officers or agents understand the context without ambiguity. This form of communication is critical in public safety scenarios, as it prevents potential misinterpretations regarding the nature of the suspension. The details provided in this format allow for appropriate actions to be taken, while also ensuring that relevant databases are checked for additional information (like the ND status). The use of coded language (104 secure 27) adheres to standard reporting protocols, which is important for maintaining communication consistency among agencies. In contrast, the other choices either lack the necessary detail or do not follow established protocols, which can lead to misunderstandings during interactions that may require immediate action based on the status of the individual’s license.

The most accurate way to communicate that an individual has a Minnesota license which is suspended for identification purposes only is through a detailed and specific response. The option indicating a secure acknowledgment provides essential information for law enforcement or other parties involved. It clearly states that the MN status is suspended for ID only, ensuring that the responding officers or agents understand the context without ambiguity.

This form of communication is critical in public safety scenarios, as it prevents potential misinterpretations regarding the nature of the suspension. The details provided in this format allow for appropriate actions to be taken, while also ensuring that relevant databases are checked for additional information (like the ND status). The use of coded language (104 secure 27) adheres to standard reporting protocols, which is important for maintaining communication consistency among agencies.

In contrast, the other choices either lack the necessary detail or do not follow established protocols, which can lead to misunderstandings during interactions that may require immediate action based on the status of the individual’s license.